Lyme Patients Denied Care and Insurance Because of Missing Diagnostic Codes.


Global Network on Institutional Discrimination

Feb 08, 2017, 10:04 ET

VERO BEACH, Fla., Feb. 8, 2017 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Struck by a duck? Burned because your water skis caught on fire? Have a bizarre personal appearance? Fortunately, the World Health Organization has assigned over 68,000 diagnostic codes to cover these and thousands of other conditions.

When your doctor checks off one of these diagnostic codes, insurance billing goes smoothly, your case is recorded, and data is available to guide medical and public health research and health policy, track mortality, and save health care dollars.

But things can go horribly wrong when accurate diagnostic codes are absent. Many Lyme disease symptoms and complications are not found in the diagnostic codes. For example, Dr. Neil Spector, a top cancer researcher at Duke University School of Medicine, was near death because Lyme disease severely weakened his heart, requiring a life-saving heart transplant 12 years after a tick bite.

Lyme disease isn’t rare. More than 300,000 Lyme disease cases are reported each year by the CDC in the U. S. alone. It is six times more common than HIV/AIDS and twice as common as breast cancer. When appropriate diagnostic codes are missing, care is often denied and unreported, leading to life-threatening and debilitating illnesses. Patients become invisible to the medical system and to those guiding public policy.

Without diagnostic codes, physicians are hamstrung in their ability to properly care for their patients, leaving many cut off from appropriate treatment and insurance coverage. This contributes to great personal hardship, pain, disability and expense.

But this may soon change. The Global Network on Institutional Discrimination recently contacted Dr. Ian Smith of the World Health Organization (WHO) to request a meeting to modernize the Lyme disease diagnostic codes.

Jenna Luche-Thayer, director of the Global Network on Institutional Discrimination, is confident that WHO’s policies and procedures requiring engagement with stakeholders will prevail.

To support WHO’s commitment to equal access to health care, medical and scientific experts around the world have joined Luche-Thayer to develop codes that capture the many serious complications of Lyme disease. Lyme disease patients also inform and support this initiative.

With accurate codes, those “bit by a tick” can soon join those getting “struck by a duck” as having conditions worthy of treatment.

SOURCE Global Network on Institutional Discrimination